IFL or WCL?

I just finished watching both and they're both exciting. However the WCL (World Combat League) has absolutely no grappling and the Honorable Chuck Norris has said, "People want knock outs, not tap outs"...I'm not so sure Chuck. The IFL (Int'l Fighting League) is pure MMA with striking and grappling, and that's what I prefer. Martial arts as a whole are limited when you leave out key aspects to fighting. be it striking, grappling, footwork, conditioning, etc. So I'm wondering: Who likes which one better...and why? This isn't 'striking vs grappling', but a genuine question as to what you think is more entertaining. Is is just striking? Or a mix of striking and grappling? Or grappling?

IFL or WCL?
I like them both. Most I watch UFC, Pride Fighting, and WCL. IFL is all right but I have no time to watch it. WCL have a women's division in each team. I want to be a future WCL fighter one day.
Reply:i prefer both and ufc is pretty good 2.
Reply:CHUCK NORRIS IS RIGHT..IF U WANT TO GRAPPLE,WRESTLE!!!!!!!!!STRIKE,STRIKE,ST...
Reply:IFL is the dummest **** i've ever seen! who gives a **** about the "CONDORS" and the "TIGERS" noone cares about these noname fighters with their stupid name teams. WCL sounds stupid as hell! No grappling= NOT MMA!
Reply:IFL, great for young fighters and retired fighters who just want to teach what they know.
Reply:I prefer stand up fighting, but i also enjoy MMA.